fitc conjugated mouse anti human ace2 (Sino Biological)
Structured Review

Fitc Conjugated Mouse Anti Human Ace2, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 9 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+ace2+neutralizing+antibody/ACE2+Neutralizing+Antibody%2C+Mouse+Mab/pmc12115572-78-26-31
Average 93 stars, based on 9 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "A Novel Antiviral Therapeutic Platform: Anchoring IFN-β to the Surface of Infectious Virions Equips Interferon-Evasive Virions with Potent Antiviral Activity"
Article Title: A Novel Antiviral Therapeutic Platform: Anchoring IFN-β to the Surface of Infectious Virions Equips Interferon-Evasive Virions with Potent Antiviral Activity
Journal: Viruses
doi: 10.3390/v17050697
Figure Legend Snippet: Postulated mechanism underlying the IFNβ-ACE2 fusion protein. ( A ) A SARS-CoV-2- or NL63-infected individual is given the IFNβ-ACE2 via nebulization to the lungs. The sACE2 domain is postulated to bind the Spike protein and coat the virion with a surface array of IFN-β. Based on this strategy, the IFN-β domain will drive IFN-β signaling pathways and antiviral activity in the target cell before viral entry. IFNβ-ACE2 is postulated to provide a more concentrated and targeted approach to delivering IFN-β to the exact site and time of imminent viral infection . ( B ) Schematic diagram of the fusion protein construct consisting of an IFN-β domain and a sACE2(18-611) domain. ( C ) Schematic diagrams of the soluble control proteins: sACE2(18-611), sACE2(18-740), and IFN-β. ( D ) Schematic diagrams of the transmembrane proteins expressed in HEK cells for the ACE2-binding assay. SDS-PAGE gels showing purity of IFNβ-ACE2 ( E ), sACE2(18-740) ( F ), sACE2(18-611) ( G ), and IFN-β ( H ) proteins.
Techniques Used: Infection, Protein-Protein interactions, Activity Assay, Construct, Control, Binding Assay, SDS Page
Figure Legend Snippet: The IFN-β and sACE2 domains of IFNβ-ACE2 exhibited predicted bioactivities. ( A ) To assay the IFN-β domain, TF-1 cells were incubated with GM-CSF and either IFN-β, sACE2(18-611), or IFNβ-ACE2 then pulsed with [ 3 H]thymidine during the last 24 h of a 3-day culture. The y -axis represents counts per minute (CPM), and error bars represent the SD. Statistical significance was analyzed by use of two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test comparing the three control groups to the IFNβ-ACE2 treatment group at each concentration (ns nonsignificant, * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001). ( B – E ) To assay the ACE2 domain, HEK-Spike or HEK-control cells were incubated with designated concentrations of either sACE2(18-611) or IFNβ-ACE2 for 1 h at 4 °C. After washing, cells were stained with AF647-conjugated anti-human ACE2 antibody for 1 h at 4 °C. Cells were analyzed for ACE2 binding by flow cytometry. ( B ) Viable, single, live, and GFP + stably transfected cells (parental gate representing all cells in plot) were subgated to show the ACE2 + subset. Representative dot plots show binding of either sACE2(18-611) or IFNβ-ACE2 (2 μM each) to HEK-Spike or HEK-control cells. ( C ) Shown are percentages of ACE2 + HEK-Spike cells (ACE2 + gate/parental gate). ( D ) The MFIs of anti-ACE2 fluorescence are shown for the parental gate. ( E ) Bar graphs show mean percentages of HEK-Spike or HEK-control cells bound to ACE2 (ACE2 + gate/parental gate). Each data point represents the mean value (n = 2), and error bars represent SD. These data are representative of three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Control, Concentration Assay, Staining, Binding Assay, Flow Cytometry, Stable Transfection, Transfection, Fluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: The sACE2 domain of IFNβ-ACE2 targeted IFN-β to the surface of NL63. NL63 was incubated at 4 °C with designated concentrations of IFNβ-ACE2, sACE2(18-611), recombinant IFN-β, or IFN-β (Peprotech). After a 1 h incubation, NL63 was washed of any unbound protein using 300kD centrifugal filters. NL63-protein complexes were then added to Vero E6-TMPRSS2-T2A-ACE2 cultures (100 μL) in a 96-well plate. The cells were harvested after a 2-day incubation at 33 °C, stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain, and then surface-labeled with FITC-conjugated anti-human ACE2 and PE-conjugated anti-human TMPRSS2. After fixation and permeabilization, cells were stained with AF647-conjugated rabbit anti-NL63 nucleocapsid antibody. Cells were then analyzed for viral infection by flow cytometry. Cells were gated on viable, single, and live cells (parental gate) before subgating on nucleocapsid + , ACE2 high , or TMPRSS2 high cells. Shown are representative dot plots (( A , D , I ), x -axis = FSC-A as in ( A )) when NL63 was incubated with 1 nM IFNβ-ACE2 or controls. The IFNβ-ACE2 versus sACE2(18-611) groups were compared based on percentages of nucleocapsid + cells ( B ), percentages of ACE2 high cells ( E ), MFI of anti-ACE2 staining ( F ), percentages of TMPRSS2 high cells ( J ), and MFI of anti-TMRSS2 staining ( K ). The IFNβ-ACE2 versus IFN-β groups were compared based on percentages of nucleocapsid cells ( C ), percentages of ACE2 high cells ( G ), MFI of anti-ACE2 staining ( H ), percentages of TMPRSS2 high cells ( L ), and MFI of anti-TMPRSS2 staining ( M ). Cell percentages were calculated by dividing events in the positive subgate by the parental gate, and MFI values represent all events in the parental gate. Each data point represents the mean value (n = 2), and error bars represent SD. Statistical significance comparing IFN-β and ACE2 treatment groups to the IFNβ-ACE2 treatment group at each concentration was analyzed by use of two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). Statistical significance comparing each protein group at each concentration to blank was analyzed by use of two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (° p < 0.05, °° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001, °°°° p < 0.0001). These data are representative of three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Recombinant, Staining, Labeling, Infection, Flow Cytometry, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: The covalent linkage of IFN-β and ACE2 was required for IFN-β targeting to NL63. NL63 was incubated at 4 °C with either IFNβ-ACE2 or the unlinked combination of sACE2(18-611) and IFN-β. After a 1 h incubation, NL63 was repeatedly washed with 300kD centrifugal filters to remove proteins that lacked binding to virions. The retentates, which included virions and virion-bound proteins, were added to Vero E6-TMPRSS2-T2A-ACE2 cells in a 96-well plate. Cells were harvested after a 2-day incubation at 33 °C and stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain. Cells were surface-stained with PE-conjugated mouse anti-human TMPRSS2 and FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human ACE2. After fixation and permeabilization, cells were stained with AF647-conjugated rabbit anti-NL63 nucleocapsid antibody. Cells were analyzed for viral infection by flow cytometry. Viable, single, and live cells in the parental gate were subgated as the nucleocapsid + subset ( A ), the ACE2 high subset ( C ), and the TMPRSS2 high subset ( F ) as shown for the 1 nM concentration value. Shown are the percentages of nucleocapsid + , ACE2 high , and TMPRSS2 high subsets together with the respective MFI values ( B , D , E ), and ( G , H ), respectively. Cell percentages were calculated by dividing the events in the subset-positive/high subgate by those in the parental gate. MFI values were gated on all viable, single, and live cells (i.e., cells in the parental gate). Each data point represents the mean value (n = 2), and error bars represent SD. Statistical significance of the IFNβ-ACE2 versus the ‘IFN-β + sACE2’ treatment group at each concentration was analyzed by use of two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). Statistical significance was also assessed for treatment groups at each concentration compared to the ‘blank’ control via two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (°° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001, °°°° p < 0.0001). These data are representative of three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Binding Assay, Staining, Infection, Flow Cytometry, Concentration Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: In a non-washed in vitro infection system, IFNβ-ACE2 exhibited enhanced antiviral activity compared to IFN-β alone, ACE2 alone, or the unlinked combination. NL63 was incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with either IFNβ-ACE2, sACE2(18-611), sACE2(18-740), recombinant IFN-β, IFN-β (Peprotech), or the unlinked combination of sACE2(18-611) and IFN-β. In contrast to experiments shown in and , we omitted the virus-washing step. The NL63 + protein mixtures were added to Vero E6-TMPRSS2-T2A-ACE2 cells in a 96-well plate. The cells were harvested after a 2-day incubation at 33 °C and stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain. Cells were surface-stained with FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human ACE2, were fixed and permeabilized, and then were intracellularly stained with AF647-conjugated rabbit anti-NL63 nucleocapsid antibody. Cells were then analyzed for viral infection by flow cytometry. Cells gated as viable, single, and live cells (parent gate) were subgated to define nucleocapsid + and ACE2 high subsets. Shown ( A , D ) are representative dot plots showing percentages of the nucleocapsid + subset at the 1 pM concentration. Shown ( B , F ) are the percentages of the nucleocapsid + subset for each group over concentrations ranging from 100 fM to 1 μM. Bar graph ( C ) shows mean percentage values of nucleocapsid + cells at the 1 pM concentration. Shown ( E ) are representative dot plots showing percentages of the ACE2 high subset at the 1 pM concentration. Shown ( G ) are the percentages of ACE2 high subset for each group over concentrations ranging from 100 fM to 1 μM. Each data point represents the mean value (n = 2), and error bars represent SD. Statistical significance was analyzed by ( C ) one-way ANOVA with the Dunnett multiple comparisons test or ( F , G ) two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test comparing the unlinked combination of IFN-β and ACE2 treatment groups to the IFNβ-ACE2 treatment group at each concentration (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001). These data are representative of three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Infection, Activity Assay, Incubation, Recombinant, Virus, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Concentration Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: IFNβ-ACE2 exhibited virus-specific targeting in accordance with viral host receptor specificity . The NL63 or 229E viruses were incubated at 4 °C with either IFNβ-ACE2, sACE2(18-611), IFN-β, or the unlinked combination of IFN-β and sACE2(18-611). After a 1 h incubation, the virus + protein mixtures were washed, and the retentate containing virion–protein complexes was used for infection of Vero E6-TMPRSS2-T2A-ACE2 or A549 cells, respectively, in a 96-well plate ( A , B ). After the washing step, IFNβ-ACE2 or the unlinked combination of IFN-β and sACE2(18-611) were directly added to designated groups ( B ). Alternatively, the virus + protein mixtures were not subjected to a virus-washing step and the mixtures were used for infection of the respective host cells ( C – E ). The cells were harvested after a 2-day incubation and stained with LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain. After fixation and permeabilization, Vero E6-TMPRSS2-T2A-ACE2 cells were stained with AF647-conjugated rabbit anti-NL63 nucleocapsid antibody and A549 cells were stained with AF647-conjugated rabbit anti-229E nucleocapsid antibody. Cells were then analyzed for viral infection by flow cytometry. Cells were gated on viable, single, and live cells before subgating on nucleocapsid + cells. Shown ( A ) are the percentages of nucleocapsid + cells for each treatment group normalized to the ‘no protein’ control group (1 nM concentrations). ( B ) Bar graph shows mean percentages of nucleocapsid + 229E-infected cells when proteins were or were not added after the washing step (1 nM concentrations). Shown ( C ) are representative dot plots including percentages of nucleocapsid + 229E-infected cells (1 nM concentrations). Shown ( D ) are the percentages of nucleocapsid + cells for each treatment group normalized to the ‘no protein’ group for each virus (1 μM concentrations). Shown ( E ) are the percentages of nucleocapsid + 229E-infected cells for each treatment group at designated concentrations (100 fM to 100 nM). Each data point represents the mean value (n = 2), and error bars represent SD. Statistical significance was analyzed by use of two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test comparing the IFN-β and/or ACE2 treatment groups to the IFNβ-ACE2 treatment group at each concentration (unless otherwise noted in the figure) (ns nonsignificant, **** p < 0.0001). Experiments shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Virus, Incubation, Infection, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Control, Concentration Assay
Related Articles
Incubation:Article Title: ACE2-independent sarbecovirus cell entry can be supported by TMPRSS2-related enzymes and can reduce sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization Article Snippet: .. To determine whether ACE2 was required for entry, Vero-TMPRSS2 cells were incubated with Article Title: ACE2-independent sarbecovirus cell entry is supported by TMPRSS2-related enzymes and reduces sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization Article Snippet: .. To determine whether ACE2 was required for entry, Vero-TMPRSS2 cells were incubated with Recombinant:Article Title: ACE2-independent sarbecovirus cell entry can be supported by TMPRSS2-related enzymes and can reduce sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization Article Snippet: .. To determine whether ACE2 was required for entry, Vero-TMPRSS2 cells were incubated with Article Title: ACE2-independent sarbecovirus cell entry is supported by TMPRSS2-related enzymes and reduces sensitivity to antibody-mediated neutralization Article Snippet: .. To determine whether ACE2 was required for entry, Vero-TMPRSS2 cells were incubated with |
![Huh-7 and NCI-H522 cells allow for <t>ACE2-independent</t> entry of mutant E484D. ( A ) ACE2 dependence of host cell entry. The indicated cell lines were grown in 96-well plates, incubated with ACE2 antibody (10108-MM36, Sino Biological) for 30 min and inoculated with pseudotypes bearing the indicated viral glycoproteins. Luciferase activity in cell lysates was quantified at 16–20 h postinoculation. The average of three independent experiments ± SEM is shown. Data were normalized against the assay background (i.e., particles bearing no glycoprotein, set as 1). Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t -test with Welch’s correction ( P > 0.05, not significant [ns]; P ≤ 0.05, *; P ≤ 0.01, **; P ≤ 0.001, ***; not determined [nd]). ( B ) Mutation E484D does not allow for S protein binding to ACE2 in complex with an entry-inhibiting antibody. The indicated S proteins were transiently expressed in 293T cells and the cells incubated with soluble ACE2 preincubated with the indicated concentrations of anti-ACE2 antibody. ACE2 binding was detected by incubation with a secondary antibody and the cells analyzed by flow cytometry. Soluble ACE2 binding to cells transfected with empty plasmid served as control. The average ±SEM of three biological replicates conducted with unicate samples is shown. Data were normalized against the assay background (i.e., cells incubated with secondary antibody alone). Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t -test with Welch’s correction ( P > 0.05, not significant [ns]; P ≤ 0.05, *; P ≤ 0.01, **).](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_2847/pmc11852847/pmc11852847__jvi.01230-24.f001.jpg)
